In this paper, we provide a rational analysis of the effects of sycophantic AI, considering how a Bayesian agent would respond to confirmatory evidence. Our analysis shows that such an agent will not get any closer to the truth, but will increase in their certainty about an incorrect hypothesis. We test this model in an online experiment where users are made to interact with an AI agent as they complete a rule discovery task. Our results show that the default interactions of a popular chatbot resemble the effects of providing people with confirmatory evidence, increasing confidence but bringing them no closer to the truth. These results provide a theoretical and empirical demonstration of how conversations with generative AI chatbots can facilitate delusion-like epistemic states, producing beliefs markedly divergent from reality.
Более 100 домов повреждены в российском городе-герое из-за атаки ВСУ22:53。夫子对此有专业解读
Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone!，详情可参考体育直播
With the black A being obvious and the white H being hard to make out.
江门市新会区懂润农业有限公司负责人介绍，企业只要具备相关资质，即可在产品外包装上印制带有公司统一社会信用代码的“地理标志专用标志”，而可扫码的“地理标志专用标志”贴有额度限制，相关部门会依据生产者实际种植、经营情况限量发放。