Раскрыт мотив изрезавшего молодого россиянина у метро мужчиныВ Москве арестован подозреваемый в убийстве молодого мужчины у метро «Сокол»
“中国这么大，我们必须搞实体经济，一个方面一个领域都不能少。和粮食一样，中国碗里必须装着中国粮，必须自力更生。”总书记强调。
，详情可参考新收录的资料
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
增值税法第三条所称无形资产，是指不具实物形态，但能带来经济利益的资产，包括技术、商标、著作权、商誉、自然资源使用权和其他无形资产。